Modulo 28: America, Russia: due mondi da capire

Sabato, 28 marzo 2026

09:00 – 09:15

Analisi critica dei media

Roberto Antonini (Dir. Corsi di
Giornalismo)

09:15 – 12:30

Capire l’America

Kenneth Forder  (ex alto funzionario Dipartimento Stato americano)

Sinossi della lezione

UNDERSTANDING AMERICA, OR FAILING TO UNDERSTAND « AMERIKA »

I. Introduction – who am I? What are my frames of reference and my biases? What am I trying to convince you of? Am I being honest? Can you trust me? Should I even have the right to speak to you? If so, why?

II.
Sources of American behaviour, or « The American Berzerk » Trumpism understood as « Old Wine in New Bottles »
A) ideas of Richard Hofstadter and Phillip Roth
B) Know Nothings, to Lindberg’s America First, to Pat Buchanan
C) impact of information revolution
D) impact of slavery and genocide of Native American tribes
E) impact of geography
F) who really won the Civil War?
G) the irony of the immigration debate
H) triumph of Jacksonian America over Wilsonian/Hamiltonian/Jeffersonian models

III. Rise of American Power
A) failure of European Balance of Power from the Treaty of Westphalia to 1945
B) Wilson failed after WWI but WW2 gifted the world to America
C) Wilson as a true revolutionary (irony abounds)
D) but not a benign power – constant struggle between interests and values
E) bottom line – 70 years of unprecedented peace and stability (but you disagree)

IV. Decline and Fall of the American Empire (shout out to Gibbon)
A) empire now in collapse, Deep State trying to flatten the decline curve
B) over reliance on liberal economics – curse of Ronald Reagan/Milton Friedman
C) dynamic tension between free trade/autarky, don’t kill goose laying golden eggs!
D) shareholder versus stakeholder capitalism
E) American versus European GDP growth rates
F) GDP growth rates versus Happiness Index – what’s better measure of success?
G) as Lou Reed once wrote – « stick a fork in it – its done »
H) the 70 glorious years will be sorely missed
I) direct democracy may work in Switzerland but proved fatal for America
J) Madison and Hamilton rolling over in their graves
K) founding fathers never envisioned an « insider threat » like Trump L) too many unwritten rules produced potentially fatal vulnerabilities
M) Constitution article 1/2 distinction eroded; we now have a Supreme Soviet

V. Importance of the November 2026 Election (or lack thereof)
A) partial recovery of American democracy/power possible if a free election is held
Type to enter text
Type to enter text
B) economy, immigration and war In Iran hurts Trump, Trans agenda helps
C) possible scenarios and their impact
D) is America already « Amerika » a proto authoritarian state?

VI. Global Tour d’Horizon CHINA
A) on the waiting deck to be the next empire?
B) fatal failure of America’s « convergence » theory vis-a-vis China
C) does China get something we don’t understand? Homo « Shopareus »?
D) who really believes in « better dead than red »?
E) only its own Marxian internal contradictions will stop China’s rise
F) Taiwan as ripe fruit ready to be plucked?
G) if you think rare earths were bad, get ready for China to control AI chips!
RUSSIA
A) Saudi Arabia with nuclear missiles
B) don’t be tricked – Russia was never part of the « West »
C) never stop thanking Ukraine for doing our dirty work for us
D) if Russia wins, Baltics are next; then nuclear war or revival of Soviet Empire
E) Swiss neutrality would die if Russia dominates Europe
F) regime change/1945 political reeducation necessary? (but remember who I am)
EUROPE
A) only Europe can stop Russia if America stays home
B) 5% of GDP for defence might not be enough
C) can Europe support both rearmament and social system maintenance?
D) is Trump right on this? Yes and Obama agreed
E) the Poles and the Finns get it; should the Poles build nukes?
F) Macron’s nuclear umbrella extension is one possible answer
G) but Germany remain the key – only state that could support war economy
H) France may have lost the will to fight but the UK has lost the means – Cyprus
I) solution is not less Europe but more Europe

Kenneth Forder

CV Kenneth Forder

Pausa pranzo

13:45 – 15:45

Giornalismo e tecnologia, rischi e opportunità

Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel (Prof. Uni Neuchâtel)

Sinossi della lezione

Le numérique a profondément reconfiguré l’écosystème informationnel et les rapports de force autour de l’information à l’intérieur des rédactions, entre médias, vis-à-vis des plateformes et envers les publics. En trente ans, les rédactions ont dû s’adapter à une accélération permanente, céder une partie de leur distribution aux plateformes, et repenser leur relation à des publics dont les pratiques d’information ont considérablement changé. Cette conférence propose de remonter aux débuts de la transition numérique pour comprendre les enjeux actuels : quels sont aujourd’hui les acteurs de l’information numérique au-delà des médias, quel rôle jouent les plateformes et les algorithmes dans la circulation de l’information, comment les modèles économiques évoluent et que font les médias pour affirmer leur indépendance et renouer avec leurs publics?

Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel

Professeure ordinaire en journalisme et communication numérique à l’université de Neuchâtel (depuis 2020). Professeure assistante en journalisme numérique à l’Université de Neuchâtel (2016-2020).

Maîtresse de conférences en Sciences de l’information et de la communication.

  • Université Grenoble 3 (2005-2013)
  • Université de Lorraine (2013-2016)